In this extract from the March 2020 Quarterly Commentary Simon Mawhinney reviews our portfolio and the devastation of markets since the start of the year and explains where we are finding opportunities amongst the rubble. You can read the full Quarterly Commentary here.




It is hard to know where to begin this quarterly report. In Australia, the widespread and devastating bushfires had barely been extinguished by damaging rains when the severity of the global COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic became apparent. We wish all our readers the very best during these tumultuous times.

Uncertainty and the anxiety it breeds doesn’t bring out the best in us. Supermarket shelves have been scooped into our trollies, oftentimes without reasonable prospects of future consumption. Similar irrational behaviour is plaguing sharemarkets around the world. Panic and short-termism has led to indiscriminate selling, the weight of which has either squashed buyer appetite or has been met with a buyers’ strike. Share prices have fallen precipitously.

As we write, the S&P/ASX 300 Index is below the levels when we first launched this strategy almost 15 years ago. Markets are rightly obsessed with the elevated levels of corporate debt and the impact that the current coronavirus will have on earnings and solvency. Very little has been spared from the carnage.

But despite being predisposed to pessimism ourselves, now is not the time to panic. Through a slightly different (longer-term) lens, we see extraordinary value for the portfolios we manage and some once-in-a-lifetime buying opportunities. Many of these companies have little or no financial leverage, provide a product or service that society needs (or soon will need again) and have superior competitive positions to their peers. Above all though, these companies are cheap.

The Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund already owns many of these companies, so it is disappointing to post performance numbers that are even poorer than the broader sharemarket’s. This is not uncommon though, with previous large market drawdowns being similarly indiscriminate. Nevertheless, we’d like to use the remainder of this quarterly report to outline how the portfolios are positioned and our activity in recent weeks.

Table 1 shows the top 10 investments which combined represent over 60% of the Equity Fund. Despite these not being the entire portfolio, they are representative of the rest of the Fund and focusing on them will hopefully give our readers insight into how we are navigating these times.

Column A details each company’s gearing (the ratio of net debt to total assets), a widely used measure of indebtedness. Column B details each company’s price to earnings ratio for its most recently reported 12 months. Given that forecast earnings are so difficult to predict today, a pre-virus earnings level is most likely the best indication of medium-term future earnings prospects. Columns C and D show the performance of these companies over the past quarter and year.

Table 1: Top 10 holdings in the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund at 31 March 2020


Source: Factset, latest company financial statements.

There are a number of key takeaways about the companies in this table


  1. They are generally lowly geared. For most of these companies, the vast majority of their asset bases have been funded by equity, not debt. In Sims’ case, it has net cash, invaluable at times like these. Two exceptions are National Australia Bank and Australian and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ). Their business models are a little different to most companies as they are in the business of borrowing money from savers and lending it to borrowers. Banks by their very nature are geared beasts and particularly prone to economic downdrafts given the loan impairments that often follow. At least some of this risk is already factored into the current share prices, with both banks trading well below their net tangible asset (NTA) levels. The banks are better capitalised than they’ve ever been before, mostly better capitalised than overseas banks and as cheaply priced relative to NTA as they were in the early-1990s.
  2. They trade at very low multiples of recent earnings which, without exception, we believe are very low themselves. We have no competitive advantage in assessing the length of time the current virus disruptions will last, but little suggests it will be permanent. Earnings will recover. It is worth clarifying two exposures in our top 10: gold (Newcrest) and energy (Woodside and Origin). In Newcrest’s case, the gold price is over A$2,500 per ounce today, 40% above last year’s levels with profits expected to increase materially on 2019’s levels. Newcrest is far more attractively priced than the 19 times historical P/E multiple suggests. Our energy exposure is almost the complete opposite. In 2019, Woodside’s realised oil price was US$50 per barrel, well above today’s low- to mid-US$20s per barrel. We expect its profits to fall materially in 2020 but we believe this to be unsustainable. At current oil prices, we believe Woodside is well positioned to survive and then thrive. We’ve addressed its low gearing above but its exceptionally low cost of production (in the low US$20s per barrel) will insulate it from the spiralling losses and gearing increases which plague other oil and gas producers. But even at US$50 per barrel, large swathes of world oil production was already in decline, capex budgets were being reduced and the financial sustainability of the massively indebted US oil producers was questionable. At today’s oil prices, well in excess of five million barrels of daily oil production would be loss making in the US alone. Low- to mid-US$20s per barrel is simply not sustainable and we expect supply to rapidly adjust to today’s reduced demand. We remain confident that oil prices will significantly exceed US$50 per barrel in the years to come but we acknowledge that the path there is likely to take longer than we had first anticipated. Our energy exposures have been our largest detractors from a performance perspective, but also offer some of the greatest future returns potential for the Equity Fund.
  3. They have significantly underperformed. During the quarter all but two of these companies (Metcash and Newcrest) underperformed the broader sharemarket. Given how weak these company share prices had been leading into the quarter, the continued underperformance appears overdone and may be consistent with the indiscriminate selling which riddles markets today. None of these companies have sustained any significant impairment to their value and all appear to be attractively priced.


Our actions during the current market sell-off

We haven’t changed the way we manage money or how we view companies. The value of a company remains the present value of its future dividend stream. We have maintained our dogged focus on company fundamentals, taking advantage of mispricings as we believe they’ve presented. Table 2 shows our trading activity during the quarter (other than for new positions less than 1% of the portfolio which we don’t disclose).


Table 2: Top five buys and sells in the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund during the quarter

Source: Allan Gray.

During the quarter we’ve exited our Coles holding and significantly trimmed our Telstra and Metcash holdings. Sales of QBE and Challenger were done in February after they reported stronger than expected results and their share prices significantly outperformed. In both these cases, this strength has completely reversed, in Challenger’s case, materially so (a fortuitous sell on our part!).

Other than our significant additions to ANZ and Newcrest, our buying has been more widespread and measured in anticipation of companies raising equity to bolster their balance sheets. Our buying in Oil Search has been partly offset by some selling in Woodside although on balance, we have modestly added to our energy exposure.

Before ending, it is worthwhile reflecting on what has happened during our previous drawdowns. We’ve been here before in 2008 and 2015. As Graph 1 shows, in both instances the recovery was significant and patient investors were rewarded handsomely. While past performance can never be relied upon to predict future performance, we nevertheless feel the opportunities presented to our investors today are strong.


Graph 1: Relative return of the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund versus the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index

Source: Allan Gray. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Net relative performance is shown for Class A of the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund and is calculated on a geometric basis.

This is further highlighted in Table 3, which shows the extent of the most significant drawdowns experienced by the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund, as well as performance relative to the Benchmark in the subsequent one-year, two-year and three-year periods.

Table 3: Major drawdowns of the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund and subsequent performance


Source: Allan Gray. Returns are not annualised and past performance is not indicative of future performance. Net relative performance is shown for Class A of the Allan Gray Australia Equity Fund and is calculated on a geometric basis.

We appreciate that these are difficult times and as much as we would have liked to have generated far better returns than we have this quarter, we are excited about the future prospects for the portfolio.

You own a share of some great companies who do or make something we all need, or will need again soon. This, together with their abnormally low prices, offers the prospect of compelling medium- to long-term returns.